Namita Thapar Faces Backlash Over Health Benefits of Namaz

Namita Thapar Faces Backlash Over Health Benefits of Namaz

Namita Thapar, known for her role as a judge on Shark Tank India and as the executive director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals, is facing significant backlash following an Instagram reel she posted on April 20, 2026. In this video, she highlighted the health benefits of namaz, describing it as a form of full-body exercise that enhances flexibility and blood circulation.

The reaction was swift and harsh. Thapar found herself at the center of online trolling, having been called derogatory names for three weeks. Yet, she remains undeterred. “Mujhe sikhaaya gaya hai, R for religion means R for respect. And is this how you respect? Especially two women,” she stated passionately in response to her critics.

This isn’t the first time Thapar has explored topics related to various faiths. Previously, she created content discussing Hindu religious practices without any controversy. However, her recent post—timed just after Eid—seems to have struck a nerve among some segments of social media users.

Thapar has invoked the concept of karma in her defense, saying, “Hinduism has a concept called Karma. God is watching.” She emphasizes the importance of respect across all religions and questions the silence surrounding online abuse against women. “Aapke liye koi nahi bolega. You have to speak up for yourself,” she urged her followers.

In light of these events, Thapar has called for people to amplify messages of respect rather than negativity. She remarked, “Negative reels meri bohat viral ho gayi hain. Ab yeh waali, viral karke dikhaaiyye,” challenging her audience to share positive content instead.

The incident highlights a broader issue regarding online harassment and the treatment of women who speak their minds on social platforms. Observers note that while some may disagree with her views, the level of vitriol directed at her raises questions about societal attitudes toward women expressing themselves—especially when it involves discussions about faith.

As this story unfolds, many are watching closely to see how both Thapar and her critics will navigate this complex landscape of religion and public discourse. Details remain unconfirmed regarding whether this incident will lead to any broader discussions or changes in how such topics are approached in public forums.